Here’s the next selection of consensus algorithms – with a short description, that might be useful in your journey through blockchain. Now we take a dive into the more centralized solutions.
Dive into the more centralized but efficient world of blockchain consensus algorithms. If you're curious about the fundamentals of consensus algorithms in blockchain, be sure to review our introductory article:
>> Consensus Algorithms in Blockchain – Part 1
DPoS stands out by allowing blockchain participants to vote for delegates who will validate blocks on their behalf. This unique feature offers several benefits:
Projects like EOS and Steemit are leveraging DPoS to provide these advantages, although it does introduce a degree of centralization into the system.
Moving towards more centralized systems, PoA is where chosen administrators validate transactions. It's particularly optimized for private blockchains, offering:
While PoA may deviate from the decentralized ethos of blockchain, it can be a practical solution for specific business applications.
PoWeight assigns the likelihood of mining a new block based on a value associated with the node, such as:
Filecoin is a prominent example that uses the amount of IPFS data stored as the "weight" in its blockchain.
BFT addresses the classic Byzantine Generals' Problem by ensuring network agreement despite potential traitorous nodes. It's a system used by Ripple and Hyperledger, known for:
Although it can introduce trust issues, these are typically addressed through a certain level of centralization.
By reimagining blockchain's potential with these centralized consensus algorithms, we open up a new frontier for enterprise solutions that balance speed, efficiency, and scalability.